# Case packet — TEMPLATE ONLY / NOT APPROVED TO SEND

Copy into ignored `private/cases/<case-id>/`. Do not put completed forms in Git.

## Review status

- Case ID / prepared date / preparer:
- Status: needs_review
- State, county, proposed forum, relevant dates:
- Receiving-number alias, ownership/use evidence:
- Candidate sender / advertised seller / proposed legal defendant (separate):
- Entity ID, registered agent, service address and retrieval source/date:
- Attribution evidence / conflicting evidence / unresolved assumptions:

## Evidence index

| Exhibit ID | Original relative path | SHA-256 | Source/custodian | Acquisition date/method | Completeness limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|

## Contact timeline

| Event ID | Date/time + zone | Transport/direction | Sender handle | Exact content reference | Source exhibit | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Include James's messages, opt-in/opt-out exchanges, confirmations, and context. Do not count reactions, duplicate exports, or text segments as separate compensable contacts without legal review.

## Facts and defenses

- Registration date / verification date / exact-number match:
- Personal/residential/business/mixed use; supporting facts:
- Purchases, inquiries, lead forms, written permissions, and dates:
- Revocation wording, method, date, delivery evidence, subsequent contacts:
- Technology evidence (not inferred merely from message style):
- Actual impact/injury, in James's own factual account:
- Arbitration clauses, releases, prior claims or settlements:
- Defenses and adverse evidence, including uncertain recollections:

## Legal review worksheet

| Proposed theory | Elements | Supporting exhibit(s) | Missing/adverse evidence | Authority + effective date + jurisdiction | Reviewer decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|

- Repeat-contact grouping and same-entity proof, where relevant:
- Proposed violation count / overlap analysis:
- Base statutory scenario (only after theory/count review):
- Enhancement basis and contrary evidence (never automatic):
- Actual-loss alternative, if documented:
- Limitations/accrual, forum, standing, service, arbitration, and cost exposure:
- Rule/case currency checked by / date:
- Lawyer/reviewer findings and revisions:

## Proposed next action — internal draft

- Action and rationale:
- Exact recipient and independently verified address:
- Exact proposed document attached; unresolved fields must prevent sending:
- Proposed amount and calculation, if any, reviewed by:
- Costs and collection assumptions:
- Authorization: NOT GRANTED
- If later authorized: actor, timestamp, recipient, purpose, document hash, scope:
- Proof of delivery/filing, response and deadlines (only if action actually occurs):

## Result

Pending / declined / settled-unpaid / paid / judgment-uncollected / closed:
Gross received / fees / expenses / net cash / James minutes / receipt exhibits:

No ready-to-send demand is supplied because no defendant, supporting facts, jurisdiction, or damages calculation has been verified.